Build a North Elementary School

What if the New Richmond School District could build an elementary school that would…

• Require no additional land


• Be 25 percent cheaper to build


• be ready for team teaching that doubles student performance


• allow for year-round scheduling if desired

This type of school is operating now in Woodbury Minnesota and was toured in April to learn just how they accomplished year-round scheduling and managed their team teaching.

The school is Valley Crossing Community School. This school was designed for 900, K-6 students in three neighborhoods,” A, B, and C. The building had three wings with folding walls to enlarge a single classroom for team teaching. Neighborhood B was scheduled for year-round and the others for traditional summer vacation. Let’s see how a smaller version might fit into the East Elementary property. See figure at top of story.

Note that the new school is situated north of the East Elementary building so we’ll call it North Elementary School for want of a better name.

Another school on East property was never considered by the Long Range Planning Committee partly because the mind set was to evaluate each building as a stand alone unit. Once it was determined that the elementary grades were overcrowded (forget the future years) it was concluded that a new neighborhood school was needed.

The committee did not define neighborhood, but it appears that most members of the committee assumed it to mean a school in some nebulous educational campus along with a high school and middle school or in one of the outlying areas, preferably north or south of New Richmond.

Since we know a large elementary such as Valley Crossing is feasible if approached in the right way, it seemed natural to research a similar, smaller building on East Elementary property. The advantage, of course, is no additional land need be purchased. Some may object to the reduction of so-called “green space.” The answer is that land for the new school would be situated in an area of scrub trees and rocks.

The new school would be designed for 600 students. To handle the additional traffic, the entrance and parking areas will have to be expanded. The cost should be no different than site preparation on new land. Note the connection to the City’s East 8th street. Traffic flow in and out of the property will have to be evaluated by the City zoning commission.

It can not be emphasized enough what an opportunity a new elementary school offers the School District. The secret to 80 percent honor roll performance at Valley Crossing is team teaching. Compare this to the 40 percent average for the state of Minnesota. This means class rooms must be expanded via folding or bellows type walls. These walls do not contribute to structural strength of exterior walls and roof. Therein lies the necessity of going to steel construction and its attendant cost saving, some estimate, to be as high as 25 percent.

Think of the advantages of team teaching: 1) A new or less efficient teacher can be mentored by more experienced teachers in a dynamic situation. 2) Student learning problems can be observed by more than one teacher to bring about a team solution. 3) A substitute teacher can be guided by the other two leading to more productive days when one teacher is absent and 4) Team teaching and learning will be observed by students so they can more easily adapt to future work requirements in employment.

The cost: $12.5 million plus land preparation.

This school should be built now to alleviate current crowded conditions. It should not be held hostage to a $72.6 million building program recommended by the Long Range Planning Committee. It may fail. Lets take the New Richmond School building program one step at a time.


060529